View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Blind Melon Chitlin
Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 56 Location: Austin Texas, Earth!
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
TTrahan: Jesus Christ! What did you do to that poor guitar?
If you don't mind my asking, what was wrong with it the way it was?
Sure I'll admit to trashing a guitar when I was in high school, but it was a Harmony and I only paid $30 for it. The original pickups make great refridgerator magnets too! The lesson I learned was that I could get a lot more out of a musical instrument by playing it, rather than fucking it up trying to make it look cool.
As for the 'nitro vs. poly' debate, it's nitro hands down IMO. I played an '89 American standard strat for several years that had a thick poly finish. When I finally got a guitar with a nitro finish there was a world of difference. A thick coat of plastic muffels resonance resulting in a guitar that's fairly dead sounding. Guitar builders know this. Violins and cellos have almost no finish on them at all. There's a reason for that. Wood vibrates better when it doesn't have something to absorb or dampan the vibrations on it. I've heard people say "It's a solid slab of wood, all you're hearing is the electronics," but that's not true because anyone who isn't tone deaf knows that different types of wood have different tonal characteristics. ie; ash vs. alder, maple vs, rosewood, etc. A thin, hard finish allows an instrument to resonate better than a thick, elastic finish does. If applied properly, a poly finish can be as good as a nitro finish. However, most of the strats I see look like they've been dipped in a vat of liquid plastic.
Having said that, I'd rather be playing my guitar than talking about it. _________________ The stars at night are big and bright.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kirk95 Starship Captain
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TTrahan wrote: | Easier to view it this way, let me know if it's not okay and I'll delete this post
|
Post all the photos you want!! We encourage it!
This is one sweet axe...very nice work! Post some clips please!
_________________ www.online-discussion.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vaughanabe13
Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have any clips yet that accurately portray the sound. I'll keep working on it.
Anyway, I know some of you out there think I'm crazy for doing this to my strat. Keep in mind a few things:
1. My parents wouldn't let me plunk down thousands on a new guitar (I'm only 17) and I outgrew my old stock Mexican Strat (plus the frets were wearing down).
2. The only method I could see of getting a new guitar would be to build it, buying a part or two every once in awhile. I built the guitar spread out over the duration of a year, so my parents got the feeling that I wasn't really spending that much money (even though I probably ended spending thousands)
3. I've admired SRV's guitar for years, and my Mexi Strat had potential. What else was I going to do with it? Sell it? Nah, I can't bear to part with my instruments
4. I wanted a guitar that nobody else has, except for maybe a few people.
5. The guitar had to be customized to MY playing style (eg. huge strings, huge frets, high-output pickups, high action)
6. The looks I get when I take that guitar into a shop or show my friends are priceless!
This guitar really was just an introduction into the world of luthiers and guitar-building. It has become my part-time hobby now. I'm already starting my next project - lightly reliced Fender 1962 strat, lake placid blue, nitro finish, vintage specs.
Also, the SRV tone era that I was going for was the super reverbs/vibroverbs era. I liked his Marshall tone, such as Live from Austin Texas DVD, but it sounded more like Jimi than Stevie. The earlier live concerts and bootlegs were my inspiration.
Anyway, thanks for all the comments and questions guys....keep it coming
PS: My relic job started off terribly. http://www.geocities.com/vaughanabe13/projectSRVBody4.html
That pic was taken on a GOOD day. Orginally my relic job looked nothing like the real thing, but my quest for near-perfection caused me to re-sand and stain the guitar many times. Eventually it started to clean up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
UncleSalty
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Ibaraki, Japan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TTrahan wrote: |
Also, lets deepen the discussion, which SRV tone do you personally go for? I have pretty much got it down to the Pre-1984 tone, and the tone from a video I have from 1987 in Daytona. Both are killer tones. Pre-84 is awesome, because it's normally the Vibroverbs/Super Reverb tone, the best IMO.
|
I think it probably deserves its own thread but here goes nothing. I like Stevie's tone on Couldn't Stand The Weather and those sessions the best. I think that's the 'biggest' tone he got. Troy mentions the Vibroverbs but I always thought the Dumble Steel String Singer was the key ingredient in Stevie's tone at that time. Once that left his set up, something was always missing for me. And I have to say, at risk of being hunted down and shot, that I don't like Stevie's distorted tone at all. I'm talking about that nasal tone he gets on the live Life Without You on the In Step reissue. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blind Melon Chitlin
Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 56 Location: Austin Texas, Earth!
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really like the tone Stevie got with the double Super/double Vibroverb rig from the '83 to early '85 period.
In response to Uncle Salty's comments about SRVs tone on the live version of "Life Without You", the nasel tone you're describing is probably a Fuzz Face. You can hear it all over the '89 Austin City Limits performance, where he's using a Dumble in his rig. I really don't like the tone he'd get when he used a Fuzz Face. _________________ The stars at night are big and bright.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Couldn't Stand the Weather tone was great, and I believe it included alot of the Dumble SSS. I love that tone.
I should have been more specific. I like the live recorded tone of pre '83. Which would make it Vibroverbs and Super Reverbs, or anything Fender, not always, but more often than not. Also lets just say that it would be between Texas Flood and In the Beginning. The tone on In the Beginning sucked IMO, which I think is all Marshalls. ANybody know? They don't sound like Fender's to me.
I like SRV's tone when he cranked up the fenders and just played, or hit the amps with a tubescreamer (ala El Mocambo). You normally only hear the Fender setup (only fenders) on the pre Texas Flood bootlegs. That tone to me, is awesome.
I know that nasally tone that salty is talking about, my guess is that it's either two tubescreamers on at once, which would add maximum nasalage or it's a fuzzface with the guitar volume knob rolled way down. SRV didn't really use the fuzzface before In Step, so it's hard to tell.
Here's a tid bit, which some might know: I listened to an interview once where SRV said he liked Fenders for his overdrive and Marshalls for his clean, which is cool, but normally folks like it the opposite. I personally like Fenders for everything, don't like overdriven Marshalls, but love clean Marshalls. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blind Melon Chitlin wrote: | I really like the tone Stevie got with the double Super/double Vibroverb rig from the '83 to early '85 period.
In response to Uncle Salty's comments about SRVs tone on the live version of "Life Without You", the nasel tone you're describing is probably a Fuzz Face. You can hear it all over the '89 Austin City Limits performance, where he's using a Dumble in his rig. I really don't like the tone he'd get when he used a Fuzz Face. |
The '89 Austin City Limits performace was the worst in the tone deptarment IMO. Pretty much anything from '89 was not good, IMO. Too much fuzz face. I don't think it's the dumble to blame, SRV had Dumbles in his setup 90% of the time, and his tone normally kicked ass |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vaughanabe13
Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I own a fuzz face myself and those little buggers are NASTY TONE SUCKERS! Ugh, I'm trying to get rid of it but nobody will take it. lol.
I will admit though, the one song that I just love listening to from '89 Austin City Limits is TIGHTROPE! I looooove that song, and the solo is unbelievably awesome with the fuzz face.
I can get pretty much all those tones with my strat, from the "Lenny" clean to the "Tightrope" distortion, to Couldn't Stand The Weather tone.
I'm working on the whole sample thing so sit tight |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
What amp are you using Vaughanabe?
Just curious.
It's still hard for me to believe that one GUITAR is giving you all of these tones, LOL. Call me stubborn, but I think its gotta be your fingers/amp/guitar all at once! I guess I'm just bustin' yer chops
Have you thought about having your fuzzface modded at all? Maybe by Alf Hermida at Hermida Audio?
Have him true bypass that sucker and put some good trannies in it, you'll have a great fuzzface!
Can't wait to hear the clips.
I found this clip, thrown together 1.5-2 years ago. It's SRV Strat before I put Van Zandts in it ---> Bad Bob clean boost (you can hear this when it's turned on) ---> Vibroverb
http://www.streamload.com/Deliver/Deliver.asp?cxInstID=15488518&nodeID=82833092&returnPage=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Estreamload%2Ecom%2FNodes%2FNode%2Easp%3FcxInstID%3D15488518%26nodeID%3D2039891615
I wanted you to listen to this just to hear the amp. The playing is half ass, but it still kind of shows the tone of the amp and guitar together. I'll try and make some more to post up here sometime, I've made some significant improvements in the guitar, and not too mention my playing since then. I'm young like you so I still have room to grow.
Last edited by TTrahan on Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blind Melon Chitlin wrote: | TTrahan: Jesus Christ! What did you do to that poor guitar?
If you don't mind my asking, what was wrong with it the way it was?
Sure I'll admit to trashing a guitar when I was in high school, but it was a Harmony and I only paid $30 for it. The original pickups make great refridgerator magnets too! The lesson I learned was that I could get a lot more out of a musical instrument by playing it, rather than fucking it up trying to make it look cool.
As for the 'nitro vs. poly' debate, it's nitro hands down IMO. I played an '89 American standard strat for several years that had a thick poly finish. When I finally got a guitar with a nitro finish there was a world of difference. A thick coat of plastic muffels resonance resulting in a guitar that's fairly dead sounding. Guitar builders know this. Violins and cellos have almost no finish on them at all. There's a reason for that. Wood vibrates better when it doesn't have something to absorb or dampan the vibrations on it. I've heard people say "It's a solid slab of wood, all you're hearing is the electronics," but that's not true because anyone who isn't tone deaf knows that different types of wood have different tonal characteristics. ie; ash vs. alder, maple vs, rosewood, etc. A thin, hard finish allows an instrument to resonate better than a thick, elastic finish does. If applied properly, a poly finish can be as good as a nitro finish. However, most of the strats I see look like they've been dipped in a vat of liquid plastic.
Having said that, I'd rather be playing my guitar than talking about it. |
Nothing was wrong with the guitar.
I had the body laying around for about 4 years. My two main guitars are not going anywhere soon, so I decided to try and relic the body that was just sitting there. Well, I found out the hard way the poly is not good for relicing
I will agree that nitro is BETTER than poly, but not THAT much better. I mean, when you're giggin' can you hear the difference? I personally can't. It's more about if the guitar is comfortable to play for me, I could care less about the finish. But that's just my opinion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
UncleSalty
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Ibaraki, Japan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
TTrahan wrote: | I'm young like you so I still have room to grow. |
Hey, I may be old but I have room to grow, too. At least, I hope so... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
UncleSalty wrote: | TTrahan wrote: | I'm young like you so I still have room to grow. |
Hey, I may be old but I have room to grow, too. At least, I hope so... |
I didn't mean it like that.
I was just playing on the fact that Vaughanabe said he was 17.
Sorry if that 'reads' bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vaughanabe13
Joined: 04 Feb 2005 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My amp is a Peavey Classic 50 all tube, 4X10 combo (50 watter) with replaced JJ tubes from Bob at www.eurotubes.com
Don't think for a second that this amp can't keep up cause it sounds amazing, all the time. Once I took off the Peavey logo for a jam and everyone was complimenting me on my "awesome Fender Bassman."
LOL, I'm not trying to brag, but I'm sure a lot of you out there think Peavey's are crap. I'm here to tell you this is one amazing working-man's amp. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
UncleSalty
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 79 Location: Ibaraki, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
TTrahan wrote: | I didn't mean it like that.
I was just playing on the fact that Vaughanabe said he was 17.
Sorry if that 'reads' bad. |
I was only stirring you, mate. It's all good. Even if Vaughanabe's younger than the number of years I've been playing... Oh and I couldn't access your clip from either of the posted links.
Cheers
Salty |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TTrahan
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
UncleSalty wrote: | TTrahan wrote: | I didn't mean it like that.
I was just playing on the fact that Vaughanabe said he was 17.
Sorry if that 'reads' bad. |
I was only stirring you, mate. It's all good. Even if Vaughanabe's younger than the number of years I've been playing... Oh and I couldn't access your clip from either of the posted links.
Cheers
Salty |
Good deal, I was hoping you didn't take it in a bad way.
Try this link -> http://www.streamload.com/App.asp I'm not sure how to stream stuff so I'll just give you the directory link.
If THAT doesn't work, this page will be up by tomorrow.
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/1/gearclipsmusic.htm
Vaughanabe - Peavey Classic 50, eh? Those are definitely great amps. Why would you say that a lot of us out there would say that they are crap? I don't see why you think that we (I) would say that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|